The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion. The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously.
When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government. However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions.
For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people.
If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not. In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people.
People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun.
Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence. For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence.
The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him. This is because even after taking the gun, the drug effects may show him to use other weapons to commit the crime.
However, when he has been led out of using the drugs, he will not use the gun wrongly, and will continue keeping and bearing it for the right purpose, which is self- defense and protecting the interests of the nation, as outlined in the constitution Dixon, Ideally, the legislations that have been created for gun control are meant for the criminals.
It goes without saying that criminals do not follow the law, and making such legislation does not stop them from committing their crimes. Criminals are very conversant with the laws and they intentionally break them so that they get what they want. The new laws that have been created for gun control are, therefore, going to affect the citizens who are not criminals and are held illegible to carry the guns.
This would be unfair to them because the criminals will always have their own ways to hide and use the guns even when the new laws are being put into practice. With this in mind, the rate of crime and violence is likely to shoot up since it is in the knowledge of the criminals that people are not holding guns, and they can, therefore, use their guns more freely than they would have used them when people are holding guns Spitzer It has also been concluded that gun laws do not work in any way.
This is in reference of earlier legislations that had been placed in hopes that they would be able to regulate gun violence. For instance, there was a law that existed between and The law required that no one was allowed to carry guns, but it did not work as gun violence did not reduce, as expected.
This shows that there is little or no correlation between gun violence and the enactment of the ban on firearm holding in the U. The legislation itself had loopholes, which the criminals used in keeping and using the guns wrongly. Other factors that may have a higher degree of correlation with gun violence are factors such as having mental illness and using drugs wrongly. When the government concentrates on confiscating guns on a measure to reduce gun violence, it will lose the track and violence will still be on the rise.
It should focus on other solutions, and gun control should come last when other measures are working. Therefore, it has been clearly indicated why it is important in letting people hold guns and why gun legislation should not be enacted. More safety and security of the state will be ensured when the government embarks on other measure to help stop gun violence in the U. Researchers have already found out that there is negative correlation between gun legislation and gun violence.
However, when the government embarks on research of how to stop gun violence through other measures such as rehabilitating people with mental illnesses and drug addicts, a permanent solution is being found for people in the nation, and gun violence will reduce since there is a substantial positive correlation between gun violence and drug abuse and mental illnesses.
So, you can order this essay and hire our writers for rewrite your essay. Marvel Essay — great place for getting your original papers for any assignments. Your email address will not be published. Gun control is a term referring to the various laws and policies that regulate everything related to the use of firearms by civilians.
The United States has a pervasive gun culture stemming from the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution which states that "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Gun control is hotly debated because it involves issues of violence as well as issues of personal defense. Some argue that the easy availability of guns contributes to a higher rate of gun violence. Those who support stricter gun control laws believe that firearms should be more regulated by governmental entities, while those who support fewer gun control laws believe that such measures take away basic rights and securities.
These are all important topics to consider when writing a gun safety essay or a gun violence essay. In an analytical essay, you make a general claim about gun control and present a balanced analysis of the topic. For an argumentative essay on gun control, you take a position for or against gun control and support your ideas with relevant evidence drawn from research.
Following a basic essay structure can help you to organize your ideas as you begin to write a gun control essay. Your essay on gun control will begin with an introduction. You will generally define your topic in the introduction and begin with a key idea or fact related to gun control.
An essay introduction includes general information about the subject you are writing about. This essay introduction opens with a statement or fact related to gun control. Often, the introduction of your essay will contain your thesis statement. A thesis statement is one sentence in which you share the purpose of your essay. In an argumentative essay on gun control your thesis statement will identify your position on an issue related to the topic.
The body of your essay is where you analyze a topic related to gun control and present information in a logical sequence.
Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays. So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control.
Gun control is a hot button issue, especially in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. It is also a polarizing issue, which means that it tends to divide people. When you’re writing an argumentative essay, it generally doesn’t matter what side of an issue you take. What matters is.
Expository gun control essay. In an expository essay, you simply list everything there is to know about the subject without expressing any opinion, i.e., you expose the subject. You can write about the current gun control regulations or talk about which ideas on gun control prevail today. Against Gun Control Essay The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of.
Gun Control Will Not Reduce Crime - Introduction The implementation of gun control in the United states is a large problem as it will take away the 2nd Amendment rights and would also stop the ability of law abiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals who obtain guns illegally. Gun Control Essay Do we really need gun control? America has recently witnessed a number of shooting and indiscriminate firing incidents in schools, malls, and villages.